How to run the Exterior Gateway Protocol projects using OMNeT++

e-mail address: omnetmanual@gmail.com

Phone number: +91 9444856435
DEFENDER

Exterior Gateway Protocol Project examples using omnet++

Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) that you can implement and simulate using OMNeT++ are discussed in this page, stay in touch with us to get your project performance. Once you share with us your parameter details, we are glad to help you out. Schedule a meeting with our team or call us now to get top notch results.

Follow the offered project examples involving Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs) that you can implement and simulate using OMNeT++:

  1. Simulation and Performance Analysis of BGP (Border Gateway Protocol)
  • Description:
    • Execute and recreate BGP that is widely used EGP, in OMNeT++ to understand its actions in inter-domain routing situations.
  • Objectives:
    • Analyze convergence time: Estimate how rapidly BGP converges after network varies includes link failures or policy updates.
    • Evaluate routing table size: Monitor how BGP handles and upholds large routing tables in a global network.
    • Test scalability: Imitate BGP in a network with a large amount of Autonomous Systems (ASes) and analyze its scalability and performance.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Execute BGP route reflection and learn its influence on convergence time and routing table size.
    • Mimic BGP policies (such as local preference, AS path prepending) and assess their effects on routing decisions.
  1. BGP Security Enhancements: Implementing and Testing RPKI
  • Description:
    • Deploy Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to optimize BGP security by precluding route hijacking and other attacks.
  • Objectives:
    • Measure impact on routing security: Assess how effectively RPKI secures from illegal route announcements.
    • Analyze performance overhead: Compute the performance effecet of RPKI on BGP operations as well as route authentication and propagation.
    • Test under attack scenarios: Mimic attacks like prefix hijacking and see how RPKI mitigates these challenges.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Discover other security optimizations like BGPsec and compare their efficiency and performance with RPKI.
    • Execute and evaluate the influence of RPKI deployment on a global scale network simulation.
  1. BGP Route Flap Damping and Its Impact on Network Stability
  • Description:
    • Execute and imitate BGP route flap damping to minimize the unpredictability caused by frequent route changes.
  • Objectives:
    • Measure stability improvements: Assess how route flap damping steadies the network by minimizing the frequency of route changes.
    • Evaluate trade-offs: See the influence of route flap damping on routing convergence and the likelihood of legal routes being suppressed.
    • Test different damping thresholds: Test with different damping parameters to track the optimal balance amongst stability and convergence.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Deploy various damping algorithms and compare their effectiveness.
    • Replicate the impact of route flap damping in networks with changing traffic patterns and levels of route instability.
  1. Implementation of BGP Multi-Homing and Its Effects on Network Resilience
  • Description:
    • Replicate a multi-homed network using BGP, where an AS is linked to several upstream suppliers for redundancy and load balancing.
  • Objectives:
    • Evaluate fault tolerance: Examine how effectively multi-homing enhances network resilience by offering substitute paths during link failures.
    • Analyze load balancing: Estimate the efficiency of traffic allocation through several links.
    • Test policy-based routing: Execute and assess the effects of various BGP policies (such as load sharing, failover) on multi-homed network performance.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Execute situations where one of the upstream suppliers modify policies, and study how the multi-homed AS reacts.
    • Recreating the impact of changing traffic loads on the performance of the multi-homed network.
  1. Simulation of BGP Path Selection Algorithms
  • Description:
    • Execute and simulate various BGP path selection algorithms containing shortest path, policy-based, and QoS-aware routing.
  • Objectives:
    • Compare path selection criteria: Evaluate how various path selection algorithms influence route selection, network performance, and load distribution.
    • Measure convergence time: Monitor the impact of each path selection algorithm on BGP convergence time.
    • Test adaptability: Mimic network changes (like link failures, policy updates) and assess how rapidly and effectively the algorithms adjusts.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Deploy and examine a hybrid path selection algorithm that integrates numerous criteria (such as shortest path and QoS).
    • Mock-up large-scale networks with diverse traffic patterns to assess the scalability of each algorithm.
  1. Simulation of BGP Communities for Policy Implementation
  • Description:
    • Configure BGP communities, a feature that enables tagging routes with particular attributes to apply routing policies.
  • Objectives:
    • Evaluate policy enforcement: Compute how BGP communities can be used to execute difficult routing policies through several ASes.
    • Test policy propagation: Simulate the propagation of community tags over various ASes and monitor their effect on routing decisions.
    • Measure impact on network performance: Estimate how community-based policies impact network performance, especially based on routing stability and efficiency.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Execute and simulate various kinds of BGP communities (like local preference, no-export) to understand their certain effects.
    • Evaluate the utilization of BGP communities in multi-homed networks and their effects on traffic engineering.
  1. BGP Convergence Analysis in Large-Scale Networks
  • Description:
    • Execute and model BGP in a large-scale network environment to study convergence actions and factors influencing it.
  • Objectives:
    • Measure convergence time: Evaluate how BGP convergence time is impacted by factors like network size, number of ASes, and topology difficulties.
    • Evaluate the impact of topology changes: Model different topology varies (e.g., link failures, new AS additions) and monitor their influence on BGP convergence.
    • Test optimization techniques: Deploy optimization techniques like route accumulation and route reflection to minimize convergence time.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Discover the influence of various BGP timers (such as hold time, keepalive) on convergence actions.
    • Mimic BGP convergence in networks with changing degrees of policy difficulty and route filtering.
  1. Interoperability Testing Between BGP and Other EGPs (e.g., EGP)
  • Description:
    • Imitate interoperability amongst BGP and other exterior gateway protocols, includes the older EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol).
  • Objectives:
    • Analyze protocol interactions: Go through how BGP communicates with other EGPs and the threats involved in upholding routing reliability.
    • Evaluate routing loop prevention: Monitor how interoperability features prevent routing loops and make certain stable route propagation.
    • Test protocol migration scenarios: Emulate the process of migrating from EGP to BGP and assess the threats and influence on network stability.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Execute situations where BGP and EGP coexist in a network, and study how they share and propagate routing information.
    • Imitate protocol upgrades and assess the impact on network convergence and performance.
  1. BGP Traffic Engineering Using MPLS
  • Description:
    • Deploy BGP in conjunction with MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) to discover traffic engineering abilities in a service supplier network.
  • Objectives:
    • Evaluate traffic distribution: Estimate how effectively MPLS with BGP can be used to allocate traffic as per the predefined policies.
    • Analyze latency and jitter: Monitor the influence of BGP-based traffic engineering on network latency and jitter, especially for delay-sensitive applications.
    • Test fault tolerance: Replicate link and node failures and compute how well the MPLS-BGP combination redirects traffic to uphold service continuity.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Develop and estimate the performance of various MPLS path selection algorithms in combination with BGP.
    • Mimic multi-domain MPLS networks and study the inter-domain traffic engineering potentials of BGP.
  1. Simulation of BGP in Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
  • Description:
    • Execute BGP in an SDN environment using OMNeT++, where the control plane is centralized and handled by an SDN controller.
  • Objectives:
    • Evaluate centralized routing decisions: Learn how the SDN controller can enhance BGP routing decisions in real-time according to the global network state.
    • Analyze scalability: Examine the scalability of BGP in large SDN-based networks with dynamic and frequent topology varies.
    • Test hybrid SDN-BGP setups: Deploy situations where traditional BGP routers co-occur with SDN-enabled routers and evaluate their interoperability.
  • Possible Extensions:
    • Implement SDN-based traffic engineering techniques that leverage BGP’s global visibility.
    • Model network slices in an SDN environment with BGP handling inter-slice routing and policy establishment.

In this manual, we encompass several example projects with their execution process and how to extend them using OMNeT++ tool. We established the Exterior Gateway Protocol projects through this set up. We will deliver any other details on this example’s implementation, if needed.

Related Topics