Performance analysis of Multi Tier Tree Topology for Time Synchronization
Implementation Plan:
Scenario 1: NTP
Step 1: Initially, we constructed a multi-tier tree topology with 90 Ethernet switches and 1 Router node with NTP protocol.
Step 2: Then, we simulate and collect network data such as packet send/receive, packet size, transmission time, propagation delay, synchronization messages and clock timestamps
Step 3: Next, we analyze the NTP protocol network sectors to observe delay, offset, jitter, drift and synchronization stability behavior based on collected data.
Step 4: Finally, we plot performance for the following metrics:
4.1: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Offset (ms)
4.2: Simulation Time (s) vs. End-to-End Delay (ms)
4.3: Simulation Time (s) vs. Jitter (ms)
4.4: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Drift (ppm)
4.5: Simulation Time (s) vs. Reachability (%)
Scenario 2: PTP
Step 1: Initially, we constructed a multi-tier tree topology with 90 Ethernet switches and 1 Router node with PTP protocol.
Step 2: Then, we simulate and collect network data such as packet send/receive, packet size, transmission time, propagation delay, synchronization messages and clock timestamps
Step 3: Next, we analyze the PTP protocol network sectors to observe delay, offset, jitter, drift and synchronization stability behavior based on collected data.
Step 4: Finally, we plot performance for the following metrics:
4.1: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Offset (ms)
4.2: Simulation Time (s) vs. End-to-End Delay (ms)
4.3: Simulation Time (s) vs. Jitter (ms)
4.4: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Drift (ppm)
4.5: Simulation Time (s) vs. Reachability (%)
Scenario 3: gPTP TSN
Step 1: Initially, we constructed a multi-tier tree topology with 90 Ethernet switches and 1 Router node with gPTP TSN protocol.
Step 2: Then, we simulate and collect network data such as packet send/receive, packet size, transmission time, propagation delay, synchronization messages and clock timestamps
Step 3: Next, we analyze the gPTP TSN protocol network sectors to observe delay, offset, jitter, drift and synchronization stability behavior based on collected data.
Step 4: Finally, we plot performance for the following metrics:
4.1: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Offset (ms)
4.2: Simulation Time (s) vs. End-to-End Delay (ms)
4.3: Simulation Time (s) vs. Jitter (ms)
4.4: Simulation Time (s) vs. Clock Drift (ppm)
4.5: Simulation Time (s) vs. Reachability (%)
Software Requirements:
1. Development Tool: OMNeT++ 4.6 or above
2. Operating System: Windows 10 (64-bit) or above
Note:
1) If the proposed plan does not fully align with your requirements, please provide all necessary details—including steps, parameters, models, and expected outcomes—in advance. Kindly ensure that any missing configurations or specifications are clearly outlined in the plan before confirming.
2) If there’s no built-in solution for what the project needs, we can always turn to reference models, customize our own, different math models or write the code ourselves to fulfil the process.
3) If the plan satisfies your requirement, Please confirm with us.
